Legal Opinion

Spray, Gould & Bowers v. Associated International Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 4, 1999No. B116450PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERSEN, J.*

Plaintiff Spray, Gould & Bowers is a law firm (SG&B) which appeals the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of the defendant Associated International Insurance Company (AIIC), based on the contract limitations period stated in the subject insurance policy. We hold that an insurer’s direct violation of duly promulgated administrative regulations issued by the California Insurance Commissioner, requiring the insurer to notify a claimant insured of time limits pertaining to the claim, may provide the basis of an estoppel against the insurer’s assertion of a contract…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  2. AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Prudential-LMI Commercial Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Union Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. In re RenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Gentry v. eBay, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Feduniak v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. City of Hollister v. Monterey InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. R & B Auto Center, Inc. v. Farmers Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API