Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. 162 North Wolfe CA6

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 15, 2014No. H038643UnpublishedCited by 44 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MARQUEZ, J .

This case involves a dispute between the owners of adjacent commercial property located in Sunnyvale at 170 North Wolfe Road (170 Wolfe, or 170 Wolfe property) and 162 North Wolfe Road (162 Wolfe, or 162 Wolfe property). In March 2010, appellants Steven Hoffman (Hoffman) and Swee Lin Hoffman (collectively, the Hoffmans), purchased the 170 Wolfe property. After close of escrow, the owner of the 162 Wolfe property, respondent 162 North Wolfe LLC (162 LLC), claimed a landscape easement and prescriptive easement rights of ingress and egress over 170 Wolfe.

162 LLC sued to quiet…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Alliance Mortgage Co. v. RothwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. LiMandri v. JudkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Mirkin v. WassermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Seeger v. OdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Bigler-Engler v. Breg, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. In re Carrier IQ, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  3. Sloan v. Gen. Motors LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
  4. Prostar Wireless Grp., LLC v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  5. Smyth v. Berman, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API