Legal Opinion

Paper Savers, Inc. v. Nacsa

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 19, 1996No. B097130PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JOHNSON,

J.—An insured appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of an insurance company and insurance agent. The insured alleges the agent misled him regarding the extent of coverage for losses of business personal property provided by the insurance policy he purchased. We conclude there are genuine issues of triable fact whether the agent made the representations, and if so, whether they were sufficient to impose a special duty on the insurer. Accordingly, we reverse.

Facts and Proceedings Below

Mike Peltier (Peltier) was the president and sole shareholder of appellant, Paper…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Blankenheim v. E. F. Hutton & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. Desai v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Hackethal v. National Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Gibson v. Government Employees InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Eddy v. SharpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. MacEy v. Allstate Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2002
  2. Boon v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
  3. Fitzpatrick v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Broberg v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Maltz v. Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API