Legal Opinion

Sarchett v. Blue Shield of California

California Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1987No. L.A. 31988PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROUSSARD, J.

This dispute arose when defendant Blue Shield of California (Blue Shield) denied plaintiff John Sarchett’s claim for hospitalization benefits in the amount of $1,203.05. Sarchett sued Blue Shield for the hospital expenses and also for a breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The trial court directed a verdict for Sarchett on breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and the jury awarded his hospital costs, $20,000 in compensatory damages and $80,000 in punitive damages. Blue Shield appeals from this verdict.

Facts and Procedural…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. McLaughlin v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1983
  4. Davis v. Blue Cross of Northern CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Van Vactor v. Blue Cross AssociationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Dercoli v. Pennsylvania National Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Jeanene Harlick v. Blue Shield of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Lunardi v. Great-West Life Assurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Hughes v. Blue Cross of Northern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Walker v. Group Health Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API