Legal Opinion
Shapero v. Zoning Board
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 28, 1984No. 11898PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
This appeal, like the appeal in Vartuli v. Sotire, 192 Conn. 353, 472 A.2d 336 (1984), decided today, presents the question whether the Coastal Management Act requires the automatic approval of a coastal site plan when a zoning board fails to act within the sixty-five day statutory period for decision. This appeal also raises an additional issue, not present in the Vartuli cases, concerning the effective date of an amendment to the Stamford zoning regulations.
The plaintiff, Paul D. Shapero, acting as trustee for the benefit of a group of individuals interested in the development of certain…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Vartuli v. SotireSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Shulman v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- MacPherson v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Lanna v. GreeneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Par Developers, Ltd. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Coastal Suburban Builders, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
- Camm v. HartConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Belanger v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.