Legal Opinion

Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 15, 1988No. 13134PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.

The plaintiff, Frito-Lay, Inc. (Frito-Lay), appealed to the Superior Court from the denial of its application for a special permit and site plan approval (application) by the named defendant, planning and zoning commission of the town of Killingly (commission).1 Although that court found Frito-Lay to be aggrieved, it dismissed its appeal.2 The Appellate Court granted Frito-Lay’s petition for certification and, thereafter, this court transferred the appeal to itself. Practice Book § 4023.

Initially, certain relevant circumstances, augmented later in this opinion, are appropriately set out at…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Burnham v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Strain v. MimsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  3. Carpenter v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  4. Couch v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  5. Vartuli v. SotireSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. Spero v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  2. Smith v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  4. Chrysler Corp. v. MaioccoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  5. Scalzo v. City of DanburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API