Legal Opinion

Lanna v. Greene

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 25, 1978PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLongo, J.

The plaintiffs, Vincent T. Lanna and Robert G. Hayduk, complained that the defendants Harold and Jean R. Greene wilfully breached a contract to convey real estate to them; that by leasing the premises to the defendant Mutual Tennis, Inc., hereinafter Mutual, the Greenes conspired with Mutual to encumber the premises and prevent the plaintiffs from acquiring title; and that the lease to Mutual was invalid. The plaintiffs sought punitive and compensatory damages, a decree setting aside Mutual’s lease and enjoining Mutual from use of the premises, and a decree that the Greenes specifically…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Malone v. SteinbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  2. Pawlinski v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  3. Texaco, Inc. v. RogowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
  4. Old Colony Trust Co. v. ChaunceyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  5. Fox v. SchaefferSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Beckenstein v. Potter & Carrier, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Kakalik v. BernardoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  3. PSE Consulting, Inc. v. MercedeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  4. Kokomo Veterans, Inc. v. SchickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Bayer v. Showmotion, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API