Legal Opinion
Shulman v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 17, 1967PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKing, C. J.
The defendant zoning board of appeals of the city of Stamford, hereinafter referred to as the board, granted an application of the defendant Twin Lakes, Inc., for a special exception to permit the operation of a swim or tennis club on a tract of land on Haviland Boad in Stamford. This appeal was taken by the plaintiff as the owner of property adjoining the premises for which the special exception was granted.
In § 3 (A) (87) of the Stamford zoning regulations, a swim or tennis club is defined as “ [a] voluntary or corporate association owned solely by its members, the objectives, pursuits and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Winslow v. Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Service Realty Corporation v. Planning & Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Blake v. MeyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Krulikowski v. Polycast CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Huhta v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Seals v. HickeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Caulkins v. PetrilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Ridgeway v. RidgewaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Beckish v. ManafortSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Builders Service Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.