Legal Opinion

Watts v. Crawford

California Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1995No. S035808PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, J.

Under governing statutes, a plaintiff is required to serve a defendant, with the summons and complaint within three years of filing the complaint in order to avoid a dismissal. (Code Civ. Proc., §§ 583.210, subd. (a), 583.250.) Section 583.240 provides, however, for the tolling of the three-year period under a number of specified circumstances. The issue in the case before us involves the proper interpretation of the provision in section 583.240, subdivision (a), that requires tolling of the three-year period for the time during which “[t]he defendant was not amenable to the…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Zamudio)California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People v. BirkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Hughes v. Board of Architectural ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Delaney v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Calvillo-Silva v. Home GroceryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API