Rue v. Quinn
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Upon further consideration of this cause, after hearing in Bank, we are satisfied with the conclusion reached by Department One in its opinion filed September 24, 1901, and for the reasons stated in said opinion the order is reversed.
Harrison, J., Van Dyke, J., McFarland, J., and Henshaw, J., concurred.
The following is the opinion rendered in Department One, above referred to: —
2Cited by62 opinions
- Wyoming Pacific Oil Co. v. PrestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Watts v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Kott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Mundo v. FústerSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963
- Parker v. ROSSUtah Supreme Court · 1950
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.