Legal Opinion

Wiggin v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1886No. 11230PublishedCited by 50 opinions

Application for a writ of prohibition. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Searls, C.

— This is an application for a writ of prohibition against the judge of the Superior Court *399(Department 9) in and for the city and county of San Francisco, commanding him to desist from further proceedings in the matter of the estate of Hannah Murphy, deceased, upon the ground that the threatened action of said court is in excess of its jurisdiction.

Samuel B. Wiggin, the petitioner, was the administrator of the estate of Hannah Murphy, deceased.

On the nineteenth day of January, 1885, the Superior Court settled the final account of the administrator, and entered a decree of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hahn v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Drake v. DuvenickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Central Pacific Railroad v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Ex parte SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Castro v. RichardsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Olivera v. GraceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Wyoming Pacific Oil Co. v. PrestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Stevens v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Matter of HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Alpers v. BlissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API