Legal Opinion

J. C. Penney Co. v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1959No. S. F. 20182PublishedCited by 61 opinions

James K. Kubota and Mikio Uchiyama for Real Parties in Interest.

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition to prevent respondent superior court from proceeding in an action on the ground that it must be dismissed under section 583 of the Code of Civil Procedure for plaintiffs’ failure to bring it to trial within five years.

Plaintiffs filed the action on December 31, 1953, but did not serve the first amended complaint and summons on petitioner until December 31, 1956. Petitioner filed its answer on January 21, 1957. On December 5, 1957, nearly four years after the action was begun, plaintiffs filed a memorandum to set the ease for trial. Respondent court set…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Christin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. City of Pasadena v. City of AlhambraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Miller & Lux Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Wyoming Pacific Oil Co. v. PrestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Pacific Greyhound Lines v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Bruns v. E-Commerce Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2011
  2. General Motors Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. McDonough Power Equipment Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Thran v. First Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Crown Coach Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API