Colorado Power Co. v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Defendant appeals on the judgment-roll alone, from all but two specified portions of a judgment in an action brought by the plaintiff to enjoin defendant from interfering with the natural flow of the north fork of the Mokelumne River in violation of plaintiff’s riparian rights. The action was tried before the court without a jury, and resulted in a verdict denying the injunction on condition defendant pay the plaintiff $1,000 as damages, and giving the plaintiff the further right to compel the defendant to release and discharge the waters involved, substantially in accordance with a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Herminghaus v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
- Collier v. Merced Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Seneca Consol. Gold Mines Co. v. Great Western Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
- Lorenz v. WaldronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- International Register Co. v. Recording Fare Register Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. ShirokowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Spaulding v. CameronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Kornoff v. Kingsburg Cotton Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- City of Lodi v. East Bay Municipal Utility DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Moore v. Cal. Oregon Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.