Legal Opinion

Moore v. Cal. Oregon Power Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1943No. Sac. 5338PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment notwithstanding the verdict entered for defendant in an action brought by plaintiffs upon a complaint setting forth two causes of action. Upon the first cause of action the plaintiffs asked for an injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with plaintiffs’ riparian rights to the waters flowing in the Klamath River. Upon the second, the plaintiffs asked for damages alleged to have been sustained by them by reason of the acts of defendant in depriving them of their riparian rights to the waters of said river. The plaintiffs abandoned…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anaheim Union Water Co. v. Fuller.California Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Miller & Lux Inc. v. Enter. Canal & Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Pabst v. FinmandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Union Mill & Mining Co. v. DangbergU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1897
  5. Collier v. Merced Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. City of Los Angeles v. City of San FernandoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. ShirokowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. City of Santa Maria v. AdamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Rank v. (Krug) United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956
  5. City of Los Angeles v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API