Legal Opinion

Seneca Consol. Gold Mines Co. v. Great Western Power Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1930No. Docket No. Sac. 4147PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESTON, J.—

This appeal involves a conflict of claims to the right of use of the waters of the North Fork of the Feather River at certain points thereon in Plumas County. The record is large and the briefs of counsel are numerous and voluminous, but we intend to confine this discussion within comparatively narrow limits.

Plaintiff, a corporation, the owner of certain lode mining claims, on the ninth day of August, 1924, sued defendant public utility corporation to enjoin it from diverting the natural and normal flow of the waters of said stream above •plaintiff’s lands. The complaint is in two…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Herminghaus v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Pabst v. FinmandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Rhodes v. WhiteheadTexas Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Henry Ford & Son, Inc. v. Little Falls Fibre Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Clinton v. . MyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1871

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Peabody v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. People v. ShirokowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. City of Lodi v. East Bay Municipal Utility DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Rank v. (Krug) United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956
  5. County of Amador v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API