Legal Opinion

Lorenz v. Waldron

California Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1892No. 14895PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Trinity County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Vanclief, C.

— Action to enjoin defendant from running a tunnel into the side of a mountain, under plaintiffs’ water-ditch. The judgment was in favor of the plaintiffs, awarding a perpetual injunction; and defendant has appealed from the judgment, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The plaintiffs’ ditch was constructed along the side of a mountain, on the public land of the United States, for mining purposes; and it is not questioned that, *244under acts of Congress, plaintiffs had acquired the right of way for, and were entitled to maintain, their ditch as constructed.

The court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clark v. WillettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Dorsey v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  3. Genet v. President of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. McMenomy v. BaudCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Sherman v. ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 1868

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Galbreath v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Chicago Telephone Co. v. Northwestern Telephone Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Colorado Power Co. v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Vesper v. Forest Lawn Cemetery Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Dunn v. YoumansIllinois Supreme Court · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API