Legal Opinion

People v. Shirokow

California Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1980No. S.F. 24026PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

The State of California appeals from a judgment denying its request for an injunction against defendant for his unauthorized diversion of water.

In this case of first impression we are asked to decide the circumstances under which the state may obtain an injunction pursuant to *304Water Code section 1052.1 Our key inquiry is whether defendant’s use of water is subject to the appropriation procedures of the code, so that failure to comply provides grounds for injunctive relief.2 Defendant asserts his use of water, though unauthorized by the State Water Resources Control Board…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Bank of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Temescal Water Co. v. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. People Ex Rel. Younger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. City of Pasadena v. City of AlhambraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Bowles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
  2. People v. WoodheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. People v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. National Audubon Society v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. United States v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API