County of Contra Costa v. Soto
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion. Tirey L. Ford, Attorney-General, C. Y. Brown, District Attorney, and Eli R. Chase, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.
At the close of plaintiff’s evidence the court granted defendants’ motion for a nonsuit, and judgment was accordingly entered. Plaintiff brings this appeal from the judgment and from an order denying its motion for a new trial. The judgment was entered December 16, 1897, and the notice of appeal therefrom served and filed March 17, 1900. Therefore, the appeal from the judgment cannot he considered, because not taken within the statutory time. . The appeal from the order is accompanied by a statement containing the evidence and proceedings. The amended complaint alleges, in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lassen County v. ShinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- County of Humboldt v. SternCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Power v. MayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Ventura County v. ClayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by9 opinions
- Morro Palisades Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
- County of Alameda v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Bates v. Ransome-Crummey Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- County of Placer v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Green v. GavinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.