County of Placer v. Freeman
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. A. K. Robinson, District Attorney, and F. P. Tuttle, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This action was brought by the district attorney of the county of Placer in the name of the county, against the defendant, who was a member of the board of supervisors of the county. As such supervisor he was ex officio a road commissioner of the county. (Pol. Code, sec. 2641.) As road commissioner he presented for payment claims against the county aggregating the sum of $458.10. These claims were for traveling and personal expenses incurred as road commissioner. They were paid. This action by the county is to recover back these moneys, and is prosecuted under the provisions of the County…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mecham v. McKayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- County of Contra Costa v. SotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Dulaney v. BurkeIdaho Supreme Court · 1890
- Harvey v. Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1890
- State ex rel. Scott v. TrousdaleNevada Supreme Court · 1881
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Collins v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- State Ex Rel. County of Musselshell v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1931
- County of Santa Barbara v. RuckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Collins v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Collins v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944