County of Alameda v. Ross
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The petitioner seeks by means of a writ of mandamus to compel the respondent to issue a warrant in payment for materials ordered by the board of supervisors of Alameda County with which to repair a part of the Fruitvale Avenue bridge across the Oakland estuary, which portion of the bridge is used exclusively for the benefit of the Southern Pacific Railroad Company.
The respondent contends there is no valid contract or legal authorization for the County of Alameda to incur or pay the indebtedness for maintaining or repairing that portion of the bridge which is used exclusively for the benefit…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hurst v. City of BurlingameCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Eastman v. PiperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Higgins v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Naify v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
- In Re City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Kremen v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Bomberger v. McKelveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Bleecher v. ConteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Highland Realty Co. v. City of San RafaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Fisher v. General Petroleum Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1954
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.