Legal Opinion

Lassen County v. Shinn

California Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1891No. 13819PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Lassen County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C.

This action was instituted by the district attorney of the plaintiff to recover from the defendants the sum of $416.25, money alleged to have been paid to them out of the plaintiff’s treasury without any authority of law, and twenty per cent damages for the use thereof, as provided in section 8 of the County Government Act. (Stats. 1883, p. 300.)

The court below gave judgment for the defendants on demurrer to the complaint, and the plaintiff appeals.

*511The facts alleged in the complaint are, in substance, as follows: That the defendants were attorneys at law residing in the county of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hornblower v. DudenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Smith v. Mayor & Common Council of Sacramento CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Scollay v. County of ButteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  4. County of Yolo v. DunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. House v. Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. County of Humboldt v. SternCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Merriam v. BarnumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Power v. MayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API