Power v. May
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County and from an order denying a new trial. Wheaton A. Gray, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Action to compel defendant, as treasurer of Tulare county, to pay to plaintiff out of the hospital fund of said county five hundred and eighty-eight dollars and ninety-four cents, the amount of a warrant, for commissions on money collected hy plaintiff from the state for the care of aged and indigent persons and orphans and half-orphans.
*149The court directed the writ of mandate to issue as prayed for, with costs. This appeal is from the judgment and from the order denying motion for a new trial.
Its appears from the findings that the hoard of supervisors made a contract in December,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lassen County v. ShinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Merriam v. BarnumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Lamberson v. JefferdsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Power v. MayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Tuolumne County v. Stanislaus CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
3Cited by15 opinions
- Coulter v. PoolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Frohliger v. RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Mecom v. FordTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Buck v. City of EurekaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- State ex rel. Shea v. CockingMontana Supreme Court · 1923
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.