Legal Opinion

Ventura County v. Clay

California Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1897No. L. A. No. 341PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Ventura County. Walter Van Dyke, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

The district attorney instituted this action in the name and on behalf of the county to recover from the treasurer of the county, and from his bondsmen, moneys alleged to have been paid on illegal claims, together with a penalty of twenty per cent upon the amount so paid.

Defendants moved to dismiss the action upon the ground that it was instituted without authority, and also interposed a general demurrer to the complaint. The motion was denied, but the de*214murrer was sustained. Upon appeal to this court, it was held that the complaint stated a cause of action against the treasurer and his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. WhitemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Clark v. WillettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  3. County of Orange v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Webb v. Honey Lake Valley Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  2. Kerby v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  3. Kingfisher County v. GrahamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Millsap v. BalfourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Tiffany Productions of California, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API