Legal Opinion

Morro Palisades Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1959No. L. A. 25357PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

This action is brought by plaintiff corporation as assignee of San Luis Obispo County. By such action the assignee seeks to have an allegedly assigned faithful performance bond reformed and to recover on it as reformed. The trial court sustained an amended demurrer to the complaint, without leave to amend, and ordered judgment of dismissal. Plaintiff appeals. We have concluded that defendant is correct in its contention that the bond could not properly be assigned to plaintiff, that no right of plaintiff to recover on the bond appears, and that the dismissal should be upheld.

The bond in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. County of San Diego v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  2. County of Placer v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Fernelius v. PierceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Milliron v. DittmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Hub Hardware Co. v. Aetna Accident & Liab. Co.California Supreme Court · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Choate, Hall & Stewart v. SCA Services, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. General Insurance Co. of America v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  3. Board of Supervisors v. Ecology One., Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1978
  4. Board of Supervisors v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983
  5. City of Merced v. American Motorists InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API