Bates v. Ransome-Crummey Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBrittain, J.
Amy Bates and ten other property owners sued the Ransome-Crummey Co., a corporation, and Louis Lightston, treasurer of the city of San Jose, to quiet title to their respective properties and for an injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiffs’ properties or asserting any interest therein or lien thereon. Louis Lightston, as treasurer, filed a disclaimer. The Ransome-Crummey Co. answered, and by way of cross-complaint sought to establish the lien of a street assessment and the validity of bonds issued to represent the assessments on the respective parcels of land…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Miller & Lux Inc. v. Enter. Canal & Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Gray v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Lancel v. PostlethwaiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Union Collection Co. v. OliverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Estate of Hanley v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Litvinuk v. LitvinukCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Lawson v. GuildCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- National Life & Accident Ins. v. AtwoodCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1946
- Smith v. IbosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.