Deary v. Shields
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
Roy G. Deary, as the real party in interest representing the Hires Bottling Company, by means of a writ of mandamus seeks to require the trial judge of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, who presided at the trial of a suit therein entitled “Montáldo, ei al. v. Hires Bottling Company” to certify to the clerk’s transcript of the judgment roll and proceedings in said cause, including those which occurred on motion for a new trial, as provided by section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure, pursuant to which an appeal was sought to be perfected.
The respondent, as judge of the Superior Court…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lake v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Cole v. WilcoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Hurley v. Lake CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Pierce v. WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- People v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
3Cited by5 opinions
- Waller v. WallerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Carvalho v. LusardiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Arditto v. PutnamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Gunning v. ForbesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Hurst v. Hazel Hurst Foundation for the Blind, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1955