Waller v. Waller
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JANES, J.
This is an appeal by plaintiff wife from an order granting a motion by the administratrix of defendant’s estate for entry of a final decree of divorce nunc pro tunc, and from the final) decree thereupon entered. Since an appeal does not lie from the order, that portion of the appeal must be dismissed; the order is reviewable on appeal from the final decree. (Nemer v. Nemer (1953) 117 Cal.App.2d 35, 37 [254 P.2d 661]; Nicolai v. Nicolai (1950) 96 Cal.App.2d 951, 954-955 [216 P.2d 913].)
Plaintiff obtained an. interlocutory decree of divorce from;, defendant John F. Waller on…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Campbell v. GenshleaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Estate of HughesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Falk v. FalkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Da Roza v. FarrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- People v. DuffyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Michigan National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- In Re Marriage of ModnickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Haskell v. CarliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Komas v. Future Systems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Flood v. SimpsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.