Legal Opinion
People v. Thompson
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 29, 1935No. Civ. No. 5222PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This cause is before us upon an appeal from an order of the trial court taxing costs after dismissal of an eminent domain action between the same parties, for failure of the plaintiff to comply with the provisions of section 1251 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Section 1255a of the Code of Civil Procedure, as amended May 8, 1933 (Stats. 1933, p. 790), reads as follows:
“Abandonment of condemnation proceedings. Plaintiff may abandon the proceedings at any time after filing the complaint and before the expiration of thirty days after final judgment, by serving on defendants and filing…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- City of Los Angeles v. AbbottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Duffill v. Los Angeles Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Elconin v. YalenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles-Inyo Farms Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- La Mesa-Spring Valley School District v. Nobuo OtsukaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Decoto School District v. M. & S. Tile Co.California Court of Appeal · 1964
- County of Riverside v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Deary v. ShieldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Independent Iron Works, Inc. v. County of TulareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.