Legal Opinion

Cole v. Wilcox

California Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1893No. 19168PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County granting a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for the alleged diversion of water from a canyon onto the plaintiff’s land, through an artificial channel constructed by the defendant’s testator. The cause was tried by a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of the defendant. A motion of the plaintiff far a new trial upon the ground, among others, that the verdict was contrary to the evidence, was granted by the court, and from this order the defendant has appealed.

The plaintiff gave notice of his intention to move for a new trial March 17, 1892, and on the twenty-first day of March obtained from…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stonesifer v. KilburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gordon v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Merralls v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Aalwyn v. CobeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Brooks v. San Francisco & North Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Sherman v. Southern Pacific Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1909

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API