Legal Opinion

Arditto v. Putnam

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 29, 1963No. Docket Nos. 26063, 26131PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.

These two eases were consolidated for purpose of trial, tried together and are presented here upon a single reporter’s transcript. Each is an action for slander of plaintiff through a news telecast delivered by defendant Putnam on January 24, 1958, pursuant to an alleged conspiracy with Miles Laboratories, Bond Stores (his sponsors) and Bruce Allen, all of whom were joined as defendants. The Arditto complaint alleges four causes of action and Dietrich’s two causes. Before trial defendants Miles Laboratories, Bond Stores and Bruce Allen paid to Arditto and Dietrich $21,-513.15 for a release of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Yarrow v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Williams v. HawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Conner v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Davis v. LucasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Frommoethelydo v. Fire Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Hearn Pacific Corp. v. Second Generation Roofing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Frommoethelydo v. Fire Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API