Lake v. Harris
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
Application for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent to authenticate a transcript on appeal. Upon the filing of the petition an order was issued requiring the respondent to show cause, if any he had, why an alternative writ of mandate should not issue. No alternative writ has been issued. The matter is submitted on a general demurrer to the petition.
It appears that in an action in ejectment in the superior court in and for the county of Alameda, wherein the Central Savings Bank of Oakland was plaintiff and the petitioners herein were defendants, a judgment was rendered and entered…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Locke Paddon v. Locke PaddonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Jeffords v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Kaltschmidt v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Waymire v. California Trona Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Griess v. State Investment & InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Lakin v. Watkins Associated IndustriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Knoff v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Williams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Lovret v. SeyfarthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Imperial Beverage Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.