Legal Opinion

Carvalho v. Lusardi

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 15, 1952No. Civ. 15157PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAGLER, J. pro tem.

This is an appeal by defendant from an order granting plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. In her complaint the plaintiff, a pedestrian, alleged that she was injured when the defendant so negligently operated his automobile as to cause it to collide with her at an intersection in the city of San Jose. The defendant denied negligence and set up the affirmative defense of contributory negligence. Judgment for defendant was entered upon a jury’s verdict. Thereafter the plaintiff moved for a new trial upon all of the statutory grounds except that of excessive damages.

The minute…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Stanley v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Buckhantz v. R. G. Hamilton & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. People v. OxnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Ambrose v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Cooper v. KelloggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pierce v. NashCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Waller v. WallerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Realty Co. of America v. BurtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Caviglia v. JarvisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Teixeira v. DomingosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API