Legal Opinion

In re the Disciplinary Action against Kimmel

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 23, 1982No. 81-955PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This disciplinary case is before the court following the referee’s recommendation that respondent be suspended. After a January 19, 1982, hearing, the referee filed his findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation that respondent be suspended while on criminal probation, provided that respondent may continue as examiner of titles for Washington County.

On June 19,1981, a Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board panel heard charges of unprofessional conduct against respondent. Following the panel’s recommendation this court issued an order September 21, 1981, suspending the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re the Discipline of SerstockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. In Re Application for Discipline of HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Matter of Discipline of FlingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. In Re the Disbarment of HedlundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. In re Application for Discipline of HeinzeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against DayWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against OtisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  3. Matter of KimmelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. In re Reinstatement of WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API