Legal Opinion

In Re the Disbarment of Hedlund

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 16, 1980No. 49578PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Peter George Hedlund was a duly licensed lawyer in the State of Minnesota. He was convicted of the felonious crimes of presenting false claims to a public body, Minn.Stat. §§ 609.465 and 609.05, and diversion of corporate property from a corporation, Minn.Stat. §§ 300.60 and 609.05. On October 13, 1976, Hedlund was suspended from the practice of law pending appeal of his conviction. His conviction was affirmed by this court. State v. Strimling, 265 N.W.2d 423 (Minn.1978). This petition was filed and the matter referred to a referee for hearing. The referee recommended disbarment. We order…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burdick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. In the Matter of HissMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. State v. StrimlingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. In Re the Discipline of ScallenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. In Re Application for Discipline of ReratSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Petition of Disciplinary Action Against DafferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MandelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against KossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  4. Matter of Discipline of KraemerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Linda A. BROST, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 182692Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API