Legal Opinion

Matter of Kimmel

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 23, 1982No. 81-955PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

322 N.W.2d 224 (1982)

In the Matter of the Petition for Disciplinary Action against Harold D. KIMMEL, Jr., a Minnesota Lawyer.

No. 81-955.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

July 23, 1982.

Michael J. Hoover, Director of Lawyers Professional Responsibility, and William J. Wernz, St. Paul, for petitioner.

Collins, Buckley, Sauntry & Haugh, Theodore J. Collins and Mark W. Gehan, Jr., St. Paul, for respondent.

2Per curiam

This disciplinary case is before the court following the referee's recommendation that respondent be suspended. After a January 19, 1982, hearing, the referee filed his findings of fact, conclusions of…

3Cases cited16 opinions

In Re the Discipline of SerstockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
In Re Application for Discipline of HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
Matter of Discipline of FlingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
In Re the Disbarment of HedlundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
In re Application for Discipline of HeinzeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by4 opinions

In Re AddonizioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
In Re KeithleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
Matter of OlkonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
In re the Petition for Disciplinary Action Against OlkonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982