Legal Opinion

In Re Application for Discipline of Hanson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 10, 1960No. 37,101PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a proceeding for the disbarment of a respondent admitted to practice at the bar of this court. The general principles governing such matters are, or should be, too well known to require detañed reiteration or elaboration. Every attorney at law is held to the highest standards of ethical conduct in his professional activities. It is a ground for disbarment that an attorney manifest professional irresponsibility by the mishandling of a client’s financial affairs, 1 that he convert client’s funds to his own use and fail to account to the client for them upon demand, 2 or that he show a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Application of Smith for Reinstatement as AttorneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  2. In re Discipline of JoyceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. In Re Application for Discipline of RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  4. In re Discipline of BolandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Matter of Disciplinary Act. Against WeyhrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. In Re the Discipline of SerstockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Petition of Disciplinary Action Against DafferSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. People v. RadinskySupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
  5. Matter of Discipline of PeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API