Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Reinstatement of Williams

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 23, 1988No. CX-79-50365Published

1DissentSimonett, Justice

This case comes to us in a unique posture. Ordinarily, when a disciplinary suspension has expired and its terms met, reinstatement follows as a matter of course. See In re Kimmel, 322 N.W.2d 224 (Minn.1982), followed by In re Kimmel, 347 N.W.2d 52 (Minn.1984). Here, however, there are two complications: (1) the length of the suspension, now over 9 years, and (2) the fact that the suspension was originally ordered, not for the misconduct now adjudged, but for reasons of mental illness. Under the circumstances here, I agree that for reinstatement petitioner Williams must show by clear and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Tippett v. MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
  3. In Re Application of Strand for Reinstatement to Practice LawSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  4. In re the Disciplinary Action against KimmelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. In Re the Discipline of KimmelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API