Legal Opinion

Matter of Discipline of Fling

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 5, 1982No. 51812PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Per curiam

The Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board filed a complaint against respondent, Paul V. Fling, an attorney admitted to practice in this state, which charged him with several violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility. This court appointed the Honorable Ben F. Grussendorf, a retired district court judge, to act as referee and hear the petition for discipline. A hearing was held on May 19-21, 1981.

Referee Grussendorf found that respondent repeatedly and intentionally converted the funds of three clients, failed to maintain adequate books and records, failed to provide an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re DalySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  2. In Re the Discipline of ScallenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. In Re the Discipline of ShawSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. In re IversenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  5. Matter of Discipline of OkermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Matter of Disciplinary Act. Against WeyhrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against RooneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  3. Matter of Discipline of SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against LochowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against PylesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API