Legal Opinion

In re Application for Discipline of Heinze

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 22, 1951No. 33,684PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Application for the discipline of respondent, Thomas Jackson Heinze, an attorney at law of the state of Minnesota, admitted to practice therein on May 15, 1941.

Six charges of misconduct are made. The Honorable Levi M. Hall, one of- the judges of the district court for the fourth judicial district, named as referee, heard the evidence and made findings and a report to this court thereon. He determined that there was insufficient evidence to sustain charges IV, V, and VI against respondent, but held that charges I, II, and III were established. We have examined the evidence and find ourselves…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In re Removal of CarySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. In Re Disbarment of Essie W. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  3. In Re Disbarment of Robert J. McDonaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  4. In Re HicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. In re AckerlyNew York Supreme Court · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Anne Arundel County Bar Ass'n v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. People v. GrenemyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  3. Matter of ChristieSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
  4. In Re BrowningIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Nelson v. Real Estate CommissionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API