Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Molnar v. County of Carver Board of Commissioners

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 19, 1997No. C1-97-260PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHUMACHER, Judge.

By writ of certiorari, a land owner appeals a county board’s denial of a conditional use permit. We find that the writ was timely obtained, that certiorari was the appropriate method of appeal, and that substantial evidence supported the board’s decision. We affirm.

FACTS

Relator Edward Molnar owns 22.21 acres in Carver County that recently was rezoned from an agricultural district to a residential cluster district. The Carver County Planning Commission issued an order for a conditional use permit (CUP 9856) allowing for an additional residential home on the property.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. Dietz v. Dodge CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  3. White Bear Rod and Gun Club v. City of HugoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Scott County Lumber Co. v. City of ShakopeeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Neitzel v. County of RedwoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Moreno v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  2. Gun Lake Ass'n v. County of AitkinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  3. Nightclub Management, Ltd. v. City of Cannon FallsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
  4. Picha v. County of McLeodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
  5. CEMETERY v. City of RosevilleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API