Legal Opinion
Gun Lake Ass'n v. County of Aitkin
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 20, 2000No. C7-99-1630PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge
Respondents applied to Aitkin County for a conditional use permit (CUP) to operate a hot-mix, asphalt plant on property in Fleming Township. When the county planning commission initially considered the CUP application, it stated it was conditionally granting the application and that specific conditions for the operation of the hot-mix plant would be imposed later. The planning commission later approved certain conditions and relators appealed the planning commission’s decision to the Aitkin County Board of Commissioners, which denied the appeal. On appeal to this court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. HannukselaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Midway Center Associates v. Midway Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Barton Contracting Co., Inc. v. City of AftonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Demolition Landfill Services, LLC v. City of DuluthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Greenbush State Bank v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jorgensen v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Breza v. City of MinnetristaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Moreno v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Northern States Power Co. v. City of Mendota HeightsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Veit Co. v. Lake CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.