Legal Opinion
Moreno v. City of Minneapolis
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 9, 2004No. A03-837, A03-943PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUDSON, Judge.
In 2002, the Minneapolis Institute of Arts (MIA) applied for an amendment to its 1973 planned unit development (PUD) in order to add a new wing. The Minneapolis City Planning Commission (planning commission) approved the MIA’s application and the MIA’s neighbors (Smith and Moreno) appealed this decision to the Minneapolis City Council. The city council heard and denied the appeal, approving the MIA’s application subject to conditions recommended by the city-planning department. The neighbors appealed this decision to the district court seeking declaratory and injunctive…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Sorenson v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- American Tower, L.P. v. City of GrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Mammenga v. State Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- 500, LLC v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Breza v. City of MinnetristaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Hans Hagen Homes, Inc. v. City of MinnetristaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Breza v. City of MinnetristaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Harstad v. City of WoodburyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.