Legal Opinion

Nightclub Management, Ltd. v. City of Cannon Falls

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided April 19, 2000No. CIV.98-2370(JRT/FLN)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

TUNHEIM, District Judge.

This case involves the constitutionality of a city’s attempt to regulate a ñude dancing establishment. The Court recognizes that regulation of such businesses is clearly permissible and appropriate under the law, and respects defendant’s desire to protect its residents from the unwanted side effects of crime, prostitution, and declining neighborhoods that can accompany such businesses. Nonetheless, the Supreme Court has established specific standards that are necessary to render such regulation…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sob, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants/cross v. County of Benton, Defendant-Appellee/crossCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  2. Brownell v. City of RochesterDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2001
  3. Advantage Media, L.L.C. v. City of HopkinsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2005
  4. Carlson v. City of DuluthDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
  5. SOB, Inc. v. County of BentonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API