Legal Opinion
Scott County Lumber Co. v. City of Shakopee
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 12, 1988No. C6-87-897PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Appellant, Scott County Lumber, applied to the Shakopee city council for a conditional use permit to extract gravel for a 130 acre tract of land in the city of Shakopee. After the request was denied, Scott County Lumber appealed to the trial court. The trial court affirmed the decision concluding that the city council resolution contained legally sufficient reasons to support denial of the permit. Scott County Lumber appeals requesting review of the city council’s decision. We reverse.
FACTS
Scott County Lumber owns a 130 acre tract of land in Shakopee county, purchased in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Zylka v. City of CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Northwestern College v. City of Arden HillsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- C. R. Investments, Inc. v. Village of ShoreviewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- White Bear Docking & Storage, Inc. v. City of White Bear LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Northpointe Plaza v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- SuperAmerica Group, Inc. v. City of Little CanadaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Trisko v. City of Waite ParkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Goos RV Center v. Minnehaha County CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Molnar v. County of Carver Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.