Bell v. Solomons
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Praueisco refusing to vacate an order dismissing an action for want of prosecution. John J. Van Nostrand, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from an 'order of the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco denying her motion to vacate an order made on the motion of defendants dismissing the action for want of prosecution, (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 583). The action was commenced in November, 1899, and was tried in October, 1900. Judgment for defendants was entered in February, 1901. Plaintiff appealed to this court from that judgment and from the order denying her motion for a new trial. On November 19, 1904, the judgment and order were reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial. The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- De la Montanya v. De la MontanyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Harper v. HildrethCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Kent v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Alpers v. BlissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Moore v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lord v. GarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Litvinuk v. LitvinukCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Campanella v. CampanellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Superior Oil Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Ordway v. ArataCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.