Litvinuk v. Litvinuk
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
Paul Litvinuk sued for a divorce.. His wife, who was then living in Pennsylvania, came to California and filed an answer denying the charges made against her. When the case came on for trial, she was present but her counsel did not appear because he was then engaged in the trial of a criminal case before another judge of the same court. Following the denial of a continuance, the husband was awarded an interlocutory decree, and the wife has appealed from the judgment and also from several orders denying motions to set it aside and have a trial on the merits.
According to the affidavit of A. P.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Citti v. BavaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Mather v. MatherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Alpers v. BlissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Lawson v. GuildCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- City of Los Angeles v. GlassellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Younger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Hamasaki v. FlothoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Blue Mountain Development Co. v. CarvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- I. J. Weinrot & Son, Inc. v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Colbert v. ColbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.