Moore v. Thompson
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. A. W. Thompson, in pro. per., John S. Wright, and W. E. Colby, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
Appeal from an order vacating an order and judgment dismissing the action for want of prosecution.
The superior court made an order in this action October 23, 1899, upon the motion of the defendant, dismissing the action for want of prosecution, and judgment thereon was thereupon entered. Subsequently the plaintiff moved the court to vacate and set aside the said order upon the ground, among others, that the same was made through her inadvertence and excusable neglect. Upon the hearing this motion was granted and the judgment was set aside. From this order the defendants have appealed.
The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Melde v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Nicoll v. WeldonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Buell v. EmerichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Winchester v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Seymour v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by26 opinions
- Daley v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- People v. CarusoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Star Motor Imports, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- In Re DahnkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Smith v. Pelton Water Wheel Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.