Harper v. Hildreth
California Supreme Court
Motion to dismiss appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno Couuty, and from certain orders. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
Motion to dismiss the appeals.
The plaintiff brought this action in 1884, against Thomas Hildreth, for the purpose of dissolving a partnership between them and to procure the sale of certain lands described in the complaint and alleged to be a part of the partnership assets. The other defendants were made parties to the action by reason of their claim to some interest in the lands. In 1891, the defendants, other than Hildreth, moved the court to dismiss the action as against them and as against the lands described in the complaint, and when this motion came on for hearing the defendant…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Senter v. De BernalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Williams v. Santa Clara Mining Ass'n of Balt.California Supreme Court · 1884
- Reay v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Goyhinech v. GoyhinechCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Mayor of San Jose v. FultonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Title Ins. Trust Co. v. Calif. Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Powell v. NicholsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Hall v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Ryer v. RyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Gray v. CottonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.