De la Montanya v. De la Montanya
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco refusing to vacate a judgment. Charles W. Slack, Judge The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
This is an action to obtain a divorce, in which the plaintiff also asked for the exclusive custody and control of two children, the issue of the marriage, and also for permanent alimony, as well as for a suitable allowance to enable her to prosecute this action.
*106The defendant and the children, who were, of course, infants, were absent from the state when the suit was commenced, and have ever since remained absent. No personal service of the summons was had on the defendant, and he did not appear in the action. An attempt was made to serve the summons by publication.
It is claimed that the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Cooper v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Galpin v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Grover & Baker Sewing MacHine Co. v. RadcliffeSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Norton v. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fé RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by143 opinions
- Sampsell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Younger v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- In Re Estate of BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Murray v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.