Legal Opinion
Superior Oil Co. v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Decided April 14, 1936No. S. F. 15576PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
This is a proceeding in mandamus to compel the respondent court to dismiss an action pending therein. Said action was commenced on January 22, 1930, and is entitled “The People of the State of California, on relation of Fred S. Stevenot, Director of Natural Resources of the State of California, Plaintiff, v. Felix Oil Company, et al., defend ants,’’ No. 6222 in the files of said court. The petitioner herein is one of the defendants therein.
The action was brought under the authority of the Oil and Gas Conservation Act. (Stats. 1915, p. 1404, as amended by Stats. 1929, p. 923.) The purpose of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bandini Petroleum Co. v. Superior Court, Los Angeles Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- People of N.Y. v. . Canal Board of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Rosefield Packing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Andersen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- State v. KilburnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Lord v. GarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- California Employment Stabilization Commission v. PayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Berri v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Hoyt v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.